Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Why so contrived?: fourth amendment balancing, per se rules, and DNA database after Maryland V. King /

Kaye, David H.

Why so contrived?: fourth amendment balancing, per se rules, and DNA database after Maryland V. King / by David H. Kaye. - Illinois: Northwestern University Press, c 2014. - pages 535-598: - The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. . - Vol. 104, Number 3 00914169 .

In Maryland V. King, 133 S. Ct. 1958 (2013), the Supreme Court narrowly upheld the constitutionality of routine collection and storage of DNA samples and profiles from arrestees.

ISSN: 00914169

Subjects--Topical Terms:
Criminal law

Dewey Class. No.: BPer.363 / J84

Print
Add to your cart (remove)
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Online Stores (Bookfinder.com) Open Library (openlibrary.org)