000 | 01633nab a22002777a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 555579 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20220519093813.0 | ||
006 | sqr|pdrw|||o00| | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 220512c |||qr|pdrw|||o00| engod | ||
022 | _a0031-7721 | ||
040 | _cUM Bansalan College LIC | ||
082 |
_aBPer. 340 _bP538 |
||
100 |
_aVistan II, Edgardo Carlo L. _914546 |
||
245 |
_aGMO Scared: _bPostscripts on the Philippines' First Major Legal Battle on GMOs/ _cby Edgardo Carlo L. Vistan II |
||
260 |
_aDiliman, Quezon City, Philippines: _bUniversity of the Philippines College of Law |
||
300 | _a26 pages | ||
310 | _aQuarterly | ||
362 | _aApril 2018 | ||
440 |
_aPhilippine Law Journal _vVol.91, No.2 (April 2018) _x0031-7721 _914528 |
||
490 |
_vVol.91, No.2 (April 2018) _x0031-7721 |
||
520 | _aThis article discusses concerns arising from how the Supreme Court ruled in a case that sought to stop the field trials of a genetically modified crop. The author critiques how the Supreme Court forayed into the realm of policy-making and the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMO'S) using its own brand of the precautionary principle in a regulatory context that lacked specific legislation on GMO's. It then tackles pronouncements of the Supreme Court that appear to question the safeness of GMOs in general when only the field trials of a particular crop were assailed. Areas of improvement in the Philippines' regulation of GMOs are then identified, with the author offering some general recommendations. | ||
650 |
_aFarm produce - Genetics - Liability (Law) _914547 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBPER. |
||
999 |
_c9469 _d9469 |