UM Bansalan LIC Logo

Confronting cognitive "anchoring effect" and "blind spot" biases in federal sentencing: a modest solution for reforming a fundamental flaw/ by Mark W. Bennett.

By: Material type: Continuing resourceContinuing resourceSeries: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology | ; Vol. 104, No.3Publication details: --Illinois: Northwestern University Press, c2014.Description: pages 489-534ISSN:
  • 00914169
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • BPer.364.05 J82
Summary: Cognitive "anchoring effect" bias, especially related to numbers, like sentencing guidelines ranges, is widely recognized in cognitive psychology as an extremely robust and powerful heuristic. It is a cognitive shortcut that has a strong tendency to undermine judgments by "anchoring" a judgment to an earlier disclosed number, the anchor.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Bansalan Periodicals Bansalan Periodicals UM Bansalan College LIC Not For Loan

Cognitive "anchoring effect" bias, especially related to numbers, like sentencing guidelines ranges, is widely recognized in cognitive psychology as an extremely robust and powerful heuristic. It is a cognitive shortcut that has a strong tendency to undermine judgments by "anchoring" a judgment to an earlier disclosed number, the anchor.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.