Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Confronting cognitive "anchoring effect" and "blind spot" biases in federal sentencing: a modest solution for reforming a fundamental flaw/ by Mark W. Bennett.

By:

Bennett, Mark W

Material type:

Continuing resourceSeries: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology | ; Vol. 104, No.3Publication details: --Illinois: Northwestern University Press, c2014.Description: pages 489-534ISSN:

00914169

Subject(s):

Criminal law

DDC classification:

BPer.364.05 J82

Summary: Cognitive "anchoring effect" bias, especially related to numbers, like sentencing guidelines ranges, is widely recognized in cognitive psychology as an extremely robust and powerful heuristic. It is a cognitive shortcut that has a strong tendency to undermine judgments by "anchoring" a judgment to an earlier disclosed number, the anchor.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Bansalan Periodicals	UM Bansalan College LIC		Not For Loan

Browsing UM Bansalan College LIC shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
	10 Sizzling young supertars /	Confronting cognitive "anchoring effect" and "blind spot" biases in federal sentencing: a modest solution for reforming a fundamental flaw/	The reviced penal code book two/	Sweet treats in Magsaysay Kialeg, Davao del Sur /	Aqua purified refilling station in the municipality of Magsaysay /	Next

Cognitive "anchoring effect" bias, especially related to numbers, like sentencing guidelines ranges, is widely recognized in cognitive psychology as an extremely robust and powerful heuristic. It is a cognitive shortcut that has a strong tendency to undermine judgments by "anchoring" a judgment to an earlier disclosed number, the anchor.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.