Cinderella Story?: the social production of a forensic "science" / by Gary Edmond and Emma Cunliffe.
Material type:
- 0081-4169
- BPer 364.05 J82
Item type | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
UM Bansalan College LIC | BPer 364.05 J82 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Browsing UM Bansalan College LIC shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The last decade has witnessed unprecedented criticism of the forensic sciences from academic commentators and authoritative scientific and technical organizations. Simultaneously, podiatrists have begun to promote themselves as forensic scientists, capable of assisting investigators and courts in their endeavors to identify offenders. This article traces the emergence of forensic podiatry, particularly forensic gait analysis. Forensic gait analysis is a practice that involves comparing persons of interest in crime-related images (such as CCTV and surveillance recordings) with reference images of suspects, where the primary focus is on movement and posture. It tends to be applied when other techniques, such as the comparison of facial and body features, are constrained because of disguise (e.g., the use of balaclavas) or the low quality of the being, shed light on forensic field formation, make an assessment of the knowledge base underpinning forensic gait analysis, and reflect on what the legal recognition of forensic gait analysis reveals about the ability of common law courts to regulate expertise.
There are no comments on this title.