A means to an element: the supreme court's modified categorical approach after mathis v. united states/ by Michael McGivney
Material type:
ArticleSeries: The journal of criminal law & criminology. 421-442page ; Volume 107 Number 3Publication details: ---Chicago: Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, Summer 2017Description: 421-442pageISSN: - 0091-4169
- BPer. 364.05 J827
| Item type | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bansalan Periodicals
|
UM Bansalan College LIC | BPer. 364.05 J827 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan |
Browsing UM Bansalan College LIC shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| BPer. 364.05 J827 Congress blewett by not explicity making the fair: | BPer. 364.05 J827 Let them frye: | BPer. 364.05 J827 Revisiting the public safety exception to miranda for suspected terrorists: | BPer. 364.05 J827 A means to an element: | BPer. 364.05 J827 A right to know how you'll die: | BPer. 364.05 J827 What happens after the right to counsel ends?: using technology to assist petitioners in state post-conviction petitions and federal habeas review/ | BPer. 364.05 J827 The law of abolition/ |
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.