Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Prohibition, stare decisis, and the lagging ability of science to influence criminal procedure/ by Wesley M. Oliver

By:

Material type: Article

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Call number	Status	Date due
Bansalan Periodicals	UM Bansalan College LIC	BPer. 364.05 J827 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not for loan

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	BPer. 364.05 J827 The Unindicted co-ejaculator and necrophilia: Addressing prosecutors' logic-defying responses to exculpatory/	BPer. 364.05 J827 The chronic failure to discipline prosecutors for misconduct: Proposals for reform/	BPer. 364.05 J827 Who could it be now?: Challenging the reliability of first time in-court identifications after state v. henderson and state v. lawson/	BPer. 364.05 J827 Prohibition, stare decisis, and the lagging ability of science to influence criminal procedure/	BPer. 364.05 J827 Prosecutors and victims:	BPer. 364.05 J827 Why so Contrived? Fourth Amendment Balancing, Per Se Rules, and DNA Database After Maryland v. King/	BPer. 364.05 J827 Parental incarceration: what we know and where we needs to go/	Next

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.