Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The Validity of United States v. Nazemian Following Crawford and its Progeny: Do Criminal Defendants Have the Right to Face Their Interpreters at Trial?/ by John Kracum

By:

Material type: Article

ArticleSeries: The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 431-456p.: ; Volume.104, Number.2Publication details: --Chicago: Northwestern University School of Law, Spring 2014.Description: 431-456p.: 25.5cmISSN:

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Bansalan Periodicals	UM Bansalan College LIC	BPer.364.05 J827 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not for loan

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	BPer.364.05 J827. Realizing Reliability in Forensic Science from the Ground Up/	BPer.364.05 J827. Expungement and Post-exoneration Offending/	BPer.364.05 J827 Autocorrect? A Proposal to Encourage Voluntary Restitution Through the White-Collar Sentencing Calculus/	BPer.364.05 J827 The Validity of United States v. Nazemian Following Crawford and its Progeny: Do Criminal Defendants Have the Right to Face Their Interpreters at Trial?/	BPer.364.05 J827 Creating Constitutional Procedure:	BPer.364.05 J827 Confronting Cognitive "Anchoring Effect" and "Blind Spot" Biases in Federal Sentencing:	BPer.364.05 J827 Fulfilling Daubter's Gatekeeping Mandate Through Court Appointed Experts/	Next

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.