UM Bansalan LIC Logo

Commercializing Justice: The Legality of Lawyer's Professional Fee Schedules under the Philippine Cometition Act/ by Avril R. Bries

By: Contributor(s): Material type: ArticleArticleSeries: Philippine Law Journal ; Vol.91, No.3 (August 2018) | ; Vol.91, No.3 (August 2018)Publication details: Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines College of LawDescription: 30 pagesISSN:
  • 0031-7721
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • BPer. 340 P538
Summary: Because of its origin and nature as a safeguard against restraints of trade, antitrust legislation is largely focused on the regulation of business enterprises. To limit the application of competition law to the traditional sphere of commerce, however, is to disregard the reality that anti-competitive practices exist in areas outside the economic conditions that necessitated its creation. This Article examines the implications of the Philippine Competition Act ("PCA") on the rules and regulations concerning lawyers' fees, and explores the legality of prescribed fee schedules vis-a-vis the state of law and jurisprudence in the US and EU on price-fixing within professions, legal or otherwise. In conclusion, the authors posit that the PCA is sufficiently broad as to apply to the practice of law, but that a distinction be made as to the nature of the entity prescribing fee schedules: price-fixing done by a private entity stands to run afoul of the PCA, but should be taken outside the ambit of regulation by the Executive if sanctioned by a public entity (such as the Integrated Bar of the Philippines) in recognition of the separation of powers and the exclusive authority of the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of law.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Bansalan Periodicals Bansalan Periodicals UM Bansalan College LIC BPer. 340 P538 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not For Loan

Because of its origin and nature as a safeguard against restraints of trade, antitrust legislation is largely focused on the regulation of business enterprises. To limit the application of competition law to the traditional sphere of commerce, however, is to disregard the reality that anti-competitive practices exist in areas outside the economic conditions that necessitated its creation. This Article examines the implications of the Philippine Competition Act ("PCA") on the rules and regulations concerning lawyers' fees, and explores the legality of prescribed fee schedules vis-a-vis the state of law and jurisprudence in the US and EU on price-fixing within professions, legal or otherwise. In conclusion, the authors posit that the PCA is sufficiently broad as to apply to the practice of law, but that a distinction be made as to the nature of the entity prescribing fee schedules: price-fixing done by a private entity stands to run afoul of the PCA, but should be taken outside the ambit of regulation by the Executive if sanctioned by a public entity (such as the Integrated Bar of the Philippines) in recognition of the separation of powers and the exclusive authority of the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of law.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.