Course Assesment survey: basis for an action plan / by John Vincent D. Panolino, Scothy U. Salgon and James A. Nieves.
Material type:
- BT/P194c/2015
Item type | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bansalan Thesis | UM Bansalan College LIC | BT/P194c/2015 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan | B0098 |
Perhaps the most promising and understudied aspect of education is course assessment. Course assessment is important because it has a strong impact on learning and is an indicator of the quality of learning occurring in a class. Methods of assessment can be very different. However, the education literature is currently lacking empirical data about the general status of assessment practices or how those practices relate to student learning. This study lays the groundwork for future studies by providing a description of formative and assumptive assessment practices lead to different types of learning. In this study, instructors appear to follow effective practice by using multiple and alternative assessment methods, dispersing grades over time, and providing timely and frequent feedback to students. Students report focusing on relatively more complex learning strategies, such as elaboration and critical thinking over rehearsal. However, online instructors need to ensure that assessment are used strategically and that feedback is productive and able to be acted upon by students.
There are no comments on this title.